• Question on FTS-0001

    From deon@3:633/509 to Rob Swindell on Wed Oct 18 19:04:45 2023
    Re: Question on FTS-0001
    By: Rob Swindell to deon on Tue Oct 17 2023 11:24 pm

    FTS-1 doesn't deal with echomail. You can wish it did, but it just doesn't.

    I dont wish it did.

    FTS-0001 talks about packed messages - which is what I'm talking about.

    I'm not sure what your refering to though...


    ...δεσ∩
    --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
    * Origin: I'm playing with ANSI+videotex - wanna play too? (3:633/509)
  • From Maurice Kinal@2:280/464.113 to Björn Felten on Wed Oct 18 10:36:39 2023
    Hey Björn!

    When was the last time you bought a desktop computer,

    Fairly recently except I call them PCs, sometimes servers when appropriate.

    other than an Apple variant,

    Never. Vastly overpriced label makers.

    that did *not* have Windows pre-installed?

    That never happened. I did have a laptop that had Windows pre-installed but it never stood a chance and it never got booted before the drive was wiped out and replaced with Linux. I still have it but hardly ever use it. The last thing I installed on there was the latest Slackware-current. It needs upgrading. I figure linux-6.6 which should be soon.

    Het leven is goed,
    Maurice

    o- -o -o -o
    /) (\ (\ (\
    ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
    ... Hyge sceal gehealden, hond gewealden.
    The mind must be restrained, the hand trained.
    --- GNU bash, version 5.2.15(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
    * Origin: Little Mikey's EuroPoint @ (2:280/464.113)
  • From Dan Clough@1:135/115 to Björn Felten on Wed Oct 18 07:41:00 2023
    Björn Felten wrote to Dan Clough <=-

    Dan Clough -> Björn Felten skrev 2023-10-18 02:52:
    What I do know is that to actually have/use that OS, you have to either purchase it,

    Or you can purchase a desktop computer.

    Okay, so even though you won't say it, you do concede that getting/using FreeDOS is indeed more readily available.

    When was the last time you bought a desktop computer, other than an
    Apple variant, that did *not* have Windows pre-installed?

    Probably around 1996 or so. I don't buy desktop computers. I buy the
    pieces and assemble them myself, and Windoze is not part of that.

    Game. Set. Match.



    ... Ignorance can be cured. Stupid is forever.
    === MultiMail/Linux v0.52
    --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
    * Origin: Palantir * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL * (1:135/115)
  • From Rob Swindell@1:103/705 to deon on Wed Oct 18 17:46:36 2023
    Re: Question on FTS-0001
    By: deon to Rob Swindell on Wed Oct 18 2023 07:04 pm

    Re: Question on FTS-0001
    By: Rob Swindell to deon on Tue Oct 17 2023 11:24 pm

    FTS-1 doesn't deal with echomail. You can wish it did, but it just doesn't.

    I dont wish it did.

    FTS-0001 talks about packed messages - which is what I'm talking about.

    I'm not sure what your refering to though...

    FTS-1 talks about packed *netmail* messages, which are different than packed *echomail* messages.
    --
    digital man (rob)

    Rush quote #65:
    He's got to make his own mistakes and learn to mend the mess he makes
    Norco, CA WX: 85.3°F, 39.0% humidity, 2 mph SSE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
    * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)
  • From Rob Swindell@1:103/705 to deon on Wed Oct 18 23:30:27 2023
    Re: Question on FTS-0001
    By: Rob Swindell to deon on Wed Oct 18 2023 05:46 pm

    Re: Question on FTS-0001
    By: deon to Rob Swindell on Wed Oct 18 2023 07:04 pm

    Re: Question on FTS-0001
    By: Rob Swindell to deon on Tue Oct 17 2023 11:24 pm

    FTS-1 doesn't deal with echomail. You can wish it did, but it just doesn't.

    I dont wish it did.

    FTS-0001 talks about packed messages - which is what I'm talking about.

    I'm not sure what your refering to though...

    Let me try further clarifcation: when FTS-1 (FSC-1) was first written, there was only one type of FidoNet message: the one-to-one private message that we now call "netmail". It wasn't until the invention described in FTS-4 that one-to-many messages (then called "conference mail", but now commonly called "echomail") was introduced. So every reference to a "message" in FTS-1 is implicitly a reference to a "netmail message". There's no mention of "netmail" or "echomail" in FTS-1 because there these terms were not in use when originally written since there was no need to disambiguate between one-to-one and one-to-many FidoNet messages. Only the former existed... until "conference mail" (and FTS-4) came along. FSC/FTS-1 was likely formalized and published some time after conference mail (echomail) was introduced and commonplace, but the orgins and chronological evolution of FidoNet was maintained in the incremental numbering and increasing comprehensiveness of the published specs. FTS-1 isn't supposed to paint the complete picture of FTN, just the foundation (with some extraneous, some now-obsolete, details thrown in for historic context).
    --
    digital man (rob)

    Breaking Bad quote #28:
    Gomey, got beat your pinata. - Hank Schrader
    Norco, CA WX: 69.1°F, 74.0% humidity, 0 mph NNE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
    * Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)