• Electricity

    From Mike Powell@1:2320/105 to ROB MCCART on Sat Apr 5 09:30:00 2025
    Water generators are the best, but few areas have a good spot to
    set that up. Not too long ago they were talking about a water
    genertor plant (Hydro Electricity?) in Ontario that has been in
    service so long that they have to convert the 25 cycle power to
    60 cycle. We got rid of 25 cycle power in the mid 1950's.

    I'm sure that one has paid for itself. B)

    Once upon a time, didn't Canada actually reroute, or reverse, the flow of
    some of their rivers in order to build more hydro plants?

    For many decades we had so much of that that our power company is
    called Ontario Hydro and most Canadians refer to all power as Hydro
    (have you paid the Hydro bill?), something we have to avoid when
    travelling in the USA or it gives us away as visiting Canadians.. B)

    The city I grew up in had a huge hydro plan at the falls on the river. I toured it as a Cub Scout. ;) It made a big impression. The Canadian references to "hydro" may seem more logical to me than others.

    Mike

    * SLMR 2.1a * "Kills millions of germs on contract"
    --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From August Abolins@1:153/757.21 to Rob Mccart on Sat Apr 5 18:28:00 2025
    Hello Rob!

    ** On Saturday 05.04.25 - 02:10, Rob Mccart wrote to GRANT WEASNER:

    There area some things about that, like solar panels and
    wind generators are not nearly as efficient as they claim
    they are. My sister bought a bunch of solar panels and
    they don't make near the power claimed, not near enough to
    handle all their needs and they paid $80,000 for them.

    I suppose they have a system that charges a bank of batteries.
    Perhaps they can expand the capacity with more batteries?

    But the best strategy would be to adjust how they use the
    available power.


    --
    ../|ug

    --- OpenXP 5.0.64
    * Origin: My Westcoast Point (1:153/757.21)
  • From Kurt Weiske@1:218/1 to August Abolins on Sun Apr 6 08:10:34 2025
    August Abolins wrote to Rob Mccart <=-

    ** On Saturday 05.04.25 - 02:10, Rob Mccart wrote to GRANT WEASNER:

    There area some things about that, like solar panels and
    wind generators are not nearly as efficient as they claim
    they are. My sister bought a bunch of solar panels and
    they don't make near the power claimed, not near enough to
    handle all their needs and they paid $80,000 for them.

    I suppose they have a system that charges a bank of batteries.
    Perhaps they can expand the capacity with more batteries?

    But the best strategy would be to adjust how they use the
    available power.

    I think Rob's sister's issue is with oversold Solar performance claims
    by a sleazy solar salesperson, not a problem with solar. Home solar
    salespeople are some of the worst around here.

    I work in renewable energy, you're exactly right about hybrid systems
    combining battery, solar and intelligent power direction. One of our
    products combines the two with a back-end that figures what to do with
    power based on time of day, historical weather, power tariffs and usage history. You can either run off solar, charge your batteries or sell
    power back based on which is more cost effective at the time.

    The abundance of similar systems makes politicians saying "what happens
    when it's dark?" sound like idiots pandering to idiots. Or someone on
    the dole from "clean coal".



    --- MultiMail/Win v0.52
    * Origin: http://realitycheckbbs.org | tomorrow's retro tech (1:218/1)
  • From Rob Mccart@1:2320/105 to MIKE POWELL on Mon Apr 7 02:23:00 2025
    RM >> Water generators are the best, but few areas have a good spot to
    >> set that up.

    Once upon a time, didn't Canada actually reroute, or reverse, the flow of
    >some of their rivers in order to build more hydro plants?

    Yes, I'm sure in most locations they have to stop the river from
    flowing some way while they install the turbines, and in some areas
    you end up with small towns under water by the time they sort it all out.

    ---
    * SLMR Rob * Tell new neighbours that the neighbourhoods gone downhill
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Rob Mccart@1:2320/105 to AUGUST ABOLINS on Mon Apr 7 02:07:00 2025
    My sister bought a bunch of solar panels and
    they don't make near the power claimed, not near enough to
    handle all their needs and they paid $80,000 for them.

    I suppose they have a system that charges a bank of batteries.
    >Perhaps they can expand the capacity with more batteries?

    But the best strategy would be to adjust how they use the
    >available power.

    Actually it was set up with a contract with Ontario Hydro and
    all the power they made was measured and fed back into the grid
    and they were paid for that power while still being billed like
    normal for the power coming into the house.

    It seemed like that was going to be super profitable since they
    were being paid per KWH more than 4 times what they had to pay
    for the electricity they bought. But as I said it didn't work out
    too well for them.. and the later contracts that Hydro set up like
    that paid less than half per KWH what my sister was being paid.
    ---
    * SLMR Rob * Borrow receipts to take to the Tax Department
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From August Abolins@1:153/757.21 to Rob Mccart on Tue Apr 8 17:28:00 2025
    Hello Rob!

    Actually it was set up with a contract with Ontario Hydro
    and all the power they made was measured and fed back into
    the grid and they were paid for that power while still
    being billed like normal for the power coming into the
    house.

    Ah.. so no batteries.


    It seemed like that was going to be super profitable since they
    were being paid per KWH more than 4 times what they had to pay
    for the electricity they bought. But as I said it didn't work out
    too well for them.. and the later contracts that Hydro set up like
    that paid less than half per KWH what my sister was being paid.

    Is the contract still in play?

    I know someone who has such a set up too. During the summer,
    the results are very good! But.. in the winter the returns are
    poor - primarily because they don't clean the snow off the
    panels!

    --
    ../|ug

    --- OpenXP 5.0.64
    * Origin: My Westcoast Point (1:153/757.21)
  • From Dr. What@1:142/999 to Rob Mccart on Wed Apr 9 07:53:29 2025
    Rob Mccart wrote to MIKE POWELL <=-

    Yes, I'm sure in most locations they have to stop the river from
    flowing some way while they install the turbines,

    They spend the first part of the construction routing the river around the dam.

    and in some areas
    you end up with small towns under water by the time they sort it all
    out.

    It's happened many, many times. But they know what towns will be impacted ahead of time.


    ... A clean desk is a sign of a cluttered desk drawer.
    ___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

    --- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A48 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: bbs.CabanaBar.net:11123 (1:142/999)
  • From Rob Mccart@1:2320/105 to AUGUST ABOLINS on Thu Apr 10 00:50:00 2025
    Actually it was set up with a contract with Ontario Hydro
    and all the power they made was measured and fed back into
    the grid and they were paid for that power

    Ah.. so no batteries.

    Yes.. I have a friend with a smaller but similar system at his
    cottage with no contract with the power company, actually he has
    his system because he couldn't get access to the grid where his
    place was located without paying to have underwater lines run to
    his place at a cost of about $25,000. He could have easly afforded
    it but he decided to go off grid out of spite.. B)

    It seemed like that was going to be super profitable since they
    were being paid per KWH more than 4 times what they had to pay
    for the electricity they bought.

    Is the contract still in play?

    Yes, it was set up for (?) maybe 15 years? Hydro was paying them
    more than 80 cents a KWH, but after a couple of years offering
    that amount they dropped the payment to new contrats to around
    30 cents/KWH. Since my sister feels she is losing money at her
    rate the new people may be in for a rude awakening.

    I know someone who has such a set up too. During the summer,
    >the results are very good! But.. in the winter the returns are
    >poor - primarily because they don't clean the snow off the
    >panels!

    She talks about how much her husband complains about cleaning off
    the panels in winter so it sounds like they are trying to stay
    on top of that. She's near Peterborough though so she's getting
    weather that's similar to what you and I get.
    (Her power is still out from that ice storm 10 days ago.)

    Ha.. speaking of, I'm starting to think a lot of our recent bad
    weather is my fault. I had a dental appoitnment (50 mile round trip)
    last week, and that day we got 4 inches of snow followed by freezing
    rain I had to drive through.. Then this week I had a follow up visit
    and the evening/night before we got about 10 inches of new snow here.
    I worried I'd be unable to get there and be charged a fee for the
    cancellation since the plow that does this road didn't show up but
    I decided to give it a shot and managed to slip and slide my way
    out the 1/2 mile to where the city plow comes in to, but it was
    fun, trying to keep my speed up dangerously high so I didn't get
    bogged down on hills and curves in all that snow, but I did make it.
    Makes me wish at times I'd gotten a car with 4WD though.. B)

    ---
    * SLMR Rob * Seduce a superior and then claim sexually harassment
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)