Water generators are the best, but few areas have a good spot to
set that up. Not too long ago they were talking about a water
genertor plant (Hydro Electricity?) in Ontario that has been in
service so long that they have to convert the 25 cycle power to
60 cycle. We got rid of 25 cycle power in the mid 1950's.
I'm sure that one has paid for itself. B)
For many decades we had so much of that that our power company is
called Ontario Hydro and most Canadians refer to all power as Hydro
(have you paid the Hydro bill?), something we have to avoid when
travelling in the USA or it gives us away as visiting Canadians.. B)
There area some things about that, like solar panels and
wind generators are not nearly as efficient as they claim
they are. My sister bought a bunch of solar panels and
they don't make near the power claimed, not near enough to
handle all their needs and they paid $80,000 for them.
August Abolins wrote to Rob Mccart <=-
** On Saturday 05.04.25 - 02:10, Rob Mccart wrote to GRANT WEASNER:
There area some things about that, like solar panels and
wind generators are not nearly as efficient as they claim
they are. My sister bought a bunch of solar panels and
they don't make near the power claimed, not near enough to
handle all their needs and they paid $80,000 for them.
I suppose they have a system that charges a bank of batteries.
Perhaps they can expand the capacity with more batteries?
But the best strategy would be to adjust how they use the
available power.
Once upon a time, didn't Canada actually reroute, or reverse, the flow of>some of their rivers in order to build more hydro plants?
My sister bought a bunch of solar panels and>Perhaps they can expand the capacity with more batteries?
they don't make near the power claimed, not near enough to
handle all their needs and they paid $80,000 for them.
I suppose they have a system that charges a bank of batteries.
But the best strategy would be to adjust how they use the>available power.
Actually it was set up with a contract with Ontario Hydro
and all the power they made was measured and fed back into
the grid and they were paid for that power while still
being billed like normal for the power coming into the
house.
It seemed like that was going to be super profitable since they
were being paid per KWH more than 4 times what they had to pay
for the electricity they bought. But as I said it didn't work out
too well for them.. and the later contracts that Hydro set up like
that paid less than half per KWH what my sister was being paid.
Rob Mccart wrote to MIKE POWELL <=-
Yes, I'm sure in most locations they have to stop the river from
flowing some way while they install the turbines,
and in some areas
you end up with small towns under water by the time they sort it all
out.
Actually it was set up with a contract with Ontario Hydro
and all the power they made was measured and fed back into
the grid and they were paid for that power
Ah.. so no batteries.
It seemed like that was going to be super profitable since they
were being paid per KWH more than 4 times what they had to pay
for the electricity they bought.
Is the contract still in play?
I know someone who has such a set up too. During the summer,>the results are very good! But.. in the winter the returns are
Sysop: | Nitro |
---|---|
Location: | Portland, OR |
Users: | 7 |
Nodes: | 10 (0 / 10) |
Uptime: | 119:20:31 |
Calls: | 161 |
Files: | 755 |
Messages: | 90,666 |